North Carolina Could Be History's First State to Kick Off Presidential Primaries in 2028
A group of bipartisan thinkers is advocating for a bold move: having North Carolina hold the first presidential primary in 2028. The idea may seem like a radical departure from tradition, but those behind it argue that it could be a game-changer.
For years, New Hampshire and Iowa have dominated the early stages of presidential voting, with their primaries often setting the tone for the rest of the country. However, Andrew Bates, former senior deputy press secretary to President Biden, and Douglas Heye, a former RNC communications director, think it's time for North Carolina to take the reins.
Bates and Heye argue that giving North Carolina a primacy in presidential voting would not only boost its economy but also bring attention to the state, which they believe has been overshadowed by more traditional "first-in-line" states. By being the first to vote, North Carolina could also be the one to set the agenda for other states.
Critics argue that bypassing Iowa and New Hampshire could disrupt the delicate balance of power in the presidential nomination process. They claim that these early states provide a critical opportunity for candidates to test their message, build momentum, and avoid being "vaporized" by more established opponents.
However, Bates and Heye counter that North Carolina's larger electorate would make its primary a more representative sample of the American people, rather than just a select group of voters from New England and Iowa. By putting the first primary in 2028, they believe it could also help to level the playing field for candidates who are often overlooked due to their geographic location.
Ultimately, whether North Carolina should hold the first presidential primary in 2028 is up for debate. But as the country continues to grapple with issues like voter turnout and electoral reform, it's clear that change is on the horizon. And for those advocating for a new order, having North Carolina kick off the presidential primaries in 2028 could be just the beginning.
A group of bipartisan thinkers is advocating for a bold move: having North Carolina hold the first presidential primary in 2028. The idea may seem like a radical departure from tradition, but those behind it argue that it could be a game-changer.
For years, New Hampshire and Iowa have dominated the early stages of presidential voting, with their primaries often setting the tone for the rest of the country. However, Andrew Bates, former senior deputy press secretary to President Biden, and Douglas Heye, a former RNC communications director, think it's time for North Carolina to take the reins.
Bates and Heye argue that giving North Carolina a primacy in presidential voting would not only boost its economy but also bring attention to the state, which they believe has been overshadowed by more traditional "first-in-line" states. By being the first to vote, North Carolina could also be the one to set the agenda for other states.
Critics argue that bypassing Iowa and New Hampshire could disrupt the delicate balance of power in the presidential nomination process. They claim that these early states provide a critical opportunity for candidates to test their message, build momentum, and avoid being "vaporized" by more established opponents.
However, Bates and Heye counter that North Carolina's larger electorate would make its primary a more representative sample of the American people, rather than just a select group of voters from New England and Iowa. By putting the first primary in 2028, they believe it could also help to level the playing field for candidates who are often overlooked due to their geographic location.
Ultimately, whether North Carolina should hold the first presidential primary in 2028 is up for debate. But as the country continues to grapple with issues like voter turnout and electoral reform, it's clear that change is on the horizon. And for those advocating for a new order, having North Carolina kick off the presidential primaries in 2028 could be just the beginning.
. I mean, who wouldn't want to be the first one to make their voice heard? It's like a big wave, you know? And it makes sense that they wanna give NC more attention since we all know how awesome our BBQ and research scene is 
. But at the same time, I can see why some people would be worried about it disrupting things...like what if Iowa or New Hampshire freak out? 
It'd be like a mini-super-bowl of politics! 
. I mean, who says Iowa and New Hampshire have to always come first? They're already pretty influential, but can't we give other states a chance to shine too? 
North Carolina is a huge state with a diverse population, so having their primary first could actually be really representative of the country as a whole. Plus, it would be nice to see some change after years of the same old routine 
. Let's keep an open mind and consider new ideas – who knows, maybe 2028 will be the year we finally mix things up! 
. It's all about time to shake things up and bring some new ideas to the table. North Carolina is already a major player in the US, so why not give it a shot? The fact that Iowa and NH have been getting all the attention for years is just lazy thinking. By letting NC take the lead, we can create a more diverse and representative voting process 
. It's about time we start listening to what people want, not just what the old guard wants to hear 
like what if other states wanna get in on the action too? its not like they're gonna let it happen without a fight 
but i do see what bates & heye are saying - NC's got a pretty big population now, so it'd be kinda cool to see us take center stage 
maybe it'll even bring some more investment to the state 
and who knows, maybe it'll just be a weird way to shake things up in the nomination process 
We'd get to set the agenda for the rest of the country, boost our economy, and show everyone what we're made of. Plus, think about how much better represented the American people would be in the primary process - a larger electorate is always more inclusive! 
My kid's school in NC might still have to deal with standardized testing and school budget cuts regardless of who wins the presidency 
But seriously, can you imagine how different it would be if NC was setting the agenda instead of just Iowa and New Hampshire? 
. i'd love to see how this would play out in reality... might just be an interesting experiment in 2028 
plus think of all the economic benefits it would bring in all those candidates would be swarming to nc to campaign and stuff 
but at the same time i get why ppl are worried about disrupting the whole nomination process i feel like it would take a while to adjust but idk maybe having a larger electorate from nc would actually make it better for everyone 
anyway i think this is super cool and we need more innovation in our voting systems 
. I mean, what's wrong with the status quo? Iowa and New Hampshire have been doing it for years, and it works just fine. The argument that North Carolina's larger electorate would make its primary a more representative sample is just not convincing to me. It's not like voters in other states are going to suddenly become experts on politics overnight 
.
. I mean, can you imagine having NC's diverse electorate set the tone for the whole nation? It's a bold move, but also kinda smart 
️. I think it'd be awesome to see more states have a say in the process and not just the traditional early birds 
. Let's see how this whole thing plays out 
!
! It'll not only boost their economy but also bring in some fresh perspectives. And let's be real, who doesn't love seeing states from the South get some recognition? 
Plus, think of all the excitement that comes with having a new primary date – it could get people more pumped about voting and civic engagement! Let's hope it happens and we can see what amazing things come out of it 
On the other hand, I can see how it could disrupt the whole thing and make it harder for smaller states to get their say. And what about all those voters in Iowa and New Hampshire who've gotten used to being first? 
. Maybe we'll finally get to see some real change in the nomination process? 
doesnt it make sense to have some early states to test their message before giving the primiary to NC? 
. We need to figure out a way to make voting more accessible and representative of all Americans, not just those in certain regions or with certain backgrounds