I'm not buying this whole "not crossing the legal red line" thing from the OSNS... sounds like they're just trying to silence dissenting voices and maintain control over the narrative 
. I mean, if there are specific examples of coverage that's caused concern, why aren't they sharing them? Transparency would be a good place to start.And what's with all these "severe consequences" claims? Who decides what's "trouble" and what's not? Sounds like a lot of room for abuse of power
. I'd love to see some concrete evidence or sources backing up these claims... till then, I'll be keeping a close eye on this situation 