The Duchess of Sussex's enduring title has sparked frustration and puzzlement. Despite her husband Harry's separation from the royal family, Meghan remains committed to using her aristocratic honorifics. It raises questions about why she clings to these titles, especially when living in a country without a monarchy.
For many, Meghan's continued use of "Duchess" is an issue because it appears at odds with her public persona as someone who has been vocal about challenging traditional royal norms and expectations. In fact, the profile piece from Harper's Bazaar reveals that even in private settings, Meghan insists on being addressed by her title.
This phenomenon has led some to accuse Meghan and Harry of prioritizing their titles over the reality of their lives as non-royals. They have received numerous accolades for their philanthropic work, including a Humanitarians of the Year award from a mental health organization. However, many critics argue that this recognition feels undeserved, given the Sussexes' lack of involvement in traditional humanitarian efforts.
The disconnect between Meghan's actions and her title has sparked heated debate. Some have taken to social media to express their frustration with what they see as the couple's obsession with titles and accolades, rather than putting in meaningful work to back them up.
Meghan's decision to remain "Duchess of Sussex" despite her husband's separation from the royal family can be seen as a reflection of her own complicated relationship with the institution. While she has been vocal about addressing racism, sexism, and other social injustices, some argue that her continued use of titles raises questions about the authenticity of her message.
Ultimately, Meghan's decision to cling to her title is a complex issue that highlights the challenges of navigating identity and privilege in modern times. As the Sussexes continue to build their own brand and philanthropic efforts, it remains to be seen how this will shape their public image and legacy.
For many, Meghan's continued use of "Duchess" is an issue because it appears at odds with her public persona as someone who has been vocal about challenging traditional royal norms and expectations. In fact, the profile piece from Harper's Bazaar reveals that even in private settings, Meghan insists on being addressed by her title.
This phenomenon has led some to accuse Meghan and Harry of prioritizing their titles over the reality of their lives as non-royals. They have received numerous accolades for their philanthropic work, including a Humanitarians of the Year award from a mental health organization. However, many critics argue that this recognition feels undeserved, given the Sussexes' lack of involvement in traditional humanitarian efforts.
The disconnect between Meghan's actions and her title has sparked heated debate. Some have taken to social media to express their frustration with what they see as the couple's obsession with titles and accolades, rather than putting in meaningful work to back them up.
Meghan's decision to remain "Duchess of Sussex" despite her husband's separation from the royal family can be seen as a reflection of her own complicated relationship with the institution. While she has been vocal about addressing racism, sexism, and other social injustices, some argue that her continued use of titles raises questions about the authenticity of her message.
Ultimately, Meghan's decision to cling to her title is a complex issue that highlights the challenges of navigating identity and privilege in modern times. As the Sussexes continue to build their own brand and philanthropic efforts, it remains to be seen how this will shape their public image and legacy.