The US Food System is Failing its Most Vulnerable Citizens - Small Farmers Can't Keep Up with Hunger
As the country navigates the complexities of food insecurity, a crisis unfolding behind the scenes is particularly striking: small farmers are struggling to cope with the weight of their responsibilities. With the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) suspended for November due to the government shutdown, millions of Americans turned to local farmers, expecting them to provide fresh produce and other essentials.
However, the assumption that small farmers will be able to give away food without a structure in place is not only unsustainable but also jeopardizes their own livelihoods. According to Frederick Griffin, owner of Ebony Tree Farms in Georgia, "Small farms feel the shock of a crisis just as quickly as households do. Sales channels dry up, costs continue and the margin for error disappears almost overnight."
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) designed subsidies and relief programs with large-scale industrial operations in mind, leaving small farmers at an automatic disadvantage. The agency's forecasts reveal that an average of $40 billion is earmarked for direct payments and emergency subsidies to big farms, whereas small farmers receive a mere $33.5 million in competitive grants.
This disparity affects not only the survival of small farms but also the local economy and job creation. Studies by the USDA and Farmers Market Coalition show that selling through local channels allows producers to keep more of the food dollar, boosts local employment, and positively impacts state economies.
The impact on individual farmers is stark. For example, Alesha Gonzales of La Huerta de Alesha farm in Georgia noted that many small family farms will not make it to see 2026 due to financial risk. With sales through Snap accounting for a significant portion of their income, these farmers are forced to spend money out-of-pocket on expenses like seeds, water, and market booth rental fees.
The crisis in the US food system also highlights the growing precarity of small farmers, who often lack access to resources like advice and support networks. The recent termination of the Regional Food Business Centers program has left many without a vital lifeline.
To address this issue, experts recommend that policymakers permanently fund local food procurement programs like the discontinued Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) initiatives, as well as expand Snap incentive models to encourage small farmers to sell to the program. By doing so, farm businesses will benefit, and people will get access to affordable food.
The irony lies in the fact that Snap-ocalypse began on the same day the United Nations celebrated its 80th anniversary and renewed its focus on sustainable development goals, including the elimination of hunger by 2030. Yet, the USDA is widening the holes in the food safety net, leaving vulnerable consumers and growers to fall through the cracks.
As the country navigates the complexities of food insecurity, a crisis unfolding behind the scenes is particularly striking: small farmers are struggling to cope with the weight of their responsibilities. With the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) suspended for November due to the government shutdown, millions of Americans turned to local farmers, expecting them to provide fresh produce and other essentials.
However, the assumption that small farmers will be able to give away food without a structure in place is not only unsustainable but also jeopardizes their own livelihoods. According to Frederick Griffin, owner of Ebony Tree Farms in Georgia, "Small farms feel the shock of a crisis just as quickly as households do. Sales channels dry up, costs continue and the margin for error disappears almost overnight."
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) designed subsidies and relief programs with large-scale industrial operations in mind, leaving small farmers at an automatic disadvantage. The agency's forecasts reveal that an average of $40 billion is earmarked for direct payments and emergency subsidies to big farms, whereas small farmers receive a mere $33.5 million in competitive grants.
This disparity affects not only the survival of small farms but also the local economy and job creation. Studies by the USDA and Farmers Market Coalition show that selling through local channels allows producers to keep more of the food dollar, boosts local employment, and positively impacts state economies.
The impact on individual farmers is stark. For example, Alesha Gonzales of La Huerta de Alesha farm in Georgia noted that many small family farms will not make it to see 2026 due to financial risk. With sales through Snap accounting for a significant portion of their income, these farmers are forced to spend money out-of-pocket on expenses like seeds, water, and market booth rental fees.
The crisis in the US food system also highlights the growing precarity of small farmers, who often lack access to resources like advice and support networks. The recent termination of the Regional Food Business Centers program has left many without a vital lifeline.
To address this issue, experts recommend that policymakers permanently fund local food procurement programs like the discontinued Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) initiatives, as well as expand Snap incentive models to encourage small farmers to sell to the program. By doing so, farm businesses will benefit, and people will get access to affordable food.
The irony lies in the fact that Snap-ocalypse began on the same day the United Nations celebrated its 80th anniversary and renewed its focus on sustainable development goals, including the elimination of hunger by 2030. Yet, the USDA is widening the holes in the food safety net, leaving vulnerable consumers and growers to fall through the cracks.
... the US Food System is failing its most vulnerable citizens - those who need help the most can't even rely on small farmers who are trying their best? It's like they're expected to be superheroes without any support 
. And what really gets me is that the subsidy is all geared towards big farms, not the ones that actually care about the community and growing food for people in need 
. It's just not fair, you know? The local economy and job creation are gonna suffer because of this 
. We need to find a way to make it more accessible for small farmers so they can keep on doing what they're doing - providing fresh produce to those who need it most 
.
it's crazy how the US gov't is prioritizing big industrial farms over small ones that are actually providing for the community 
. and what's with the lack of resources for small farmers? like, advice and support networks are basically non-existent 
. we need more programs that help these guys sell their produce to snap and other local channels 
. it's time for policymakers to step up and make some real changes 
come on, who comes up with these subsidies 
. And don't even get me started on the gap between what's allocated for those fancy industrial farms and what's available to tiny family operations 
. It's like, can't we find a way to support everyone, not just the ones with deep pockets? 
. They're the ones who are really struggling to cope with hunger on their own without a safety net.
. Those initiatives actually help small farms sell more produce and make a living wage. It's like, they're trying to solve one problem (hunger) but creating another (small farmers struggling). We need to address the root cause here 
.
.
. We should be supporting small farmers and promoting sustainable food systems. This is a matter of food justice, fam 
its like the gov is all "good luck fam" 
while giving billions to big farms 
small farmers are literally the backbone of our food system but did u no they get like 10% of the subsidies 
The US food system's failure to support small farmers is a striking example of systemic inequality 
. It's concerning that policymakers are failing to address this pressing issue, especially with the renewed focus on sustainable development goals like eliminating hunger by 2030 
.
i mean, the usda knows exactly where to put that $40 billion, but what about our little fams? 
we need those programs for real, not just a Band-Aid solution 
seriously though, can't we just prioritize supporting our local fams instead of playing the industrial farm game? i mean, i get that big farms are hard to compete with on scale but come on, there gotta be a way to level the playing field 
. I mean, we need them to keep producing fresh, healthy food for us, but the system is stacked against them. The subsidies go to big farms, leaving small ones in the dust 
.
. We need more funding for programs that help small farms sell their produce through channels like Snap 
. And we need to make sure they have access to advice and resources when they need them 
It's like the USDA is pitting us against each other - giving big farms way more subsidies than they need, while leaving small farmers to fend for themselves.