US Farmers' Financial Burden: The Hidden Reason Behind America's Food Insecurity Crisis
The US government's latest decision to temporarily suspend Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits has left millions of Americans struggling to access basic necessities, including food. The unexpected move led to widespread panic and a scramble for local farmers, who were expected to provide assistance in the form of free produce and other essential items.
Small-scale farmers, however, are not equipped to bear the weight of this crisis. According to recent data, between half to 79% of small family farms are at risk of financial collapse due to inadequate support from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).
The system puts small farmers at a disadvantage, as subsidies and relief programs designed for large-scale operations with higher gross cash farm income (GCFI) benefits. The majority of these subsidies are tied to the production of major commodity crops like corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice, which primarily benefit industrial farming operations.
Frederick Griffin of Ebony Tree Farms in Georgia notes that small farms feel the shock of a crisis just as quickly as households do but struggle to cope due to the loss of sales channels and increased costs. Giving food away without a structured system is not only unsustainable but also jeopardizes the farm's survival.
The USDA has earmarked an average of $40 billion in direct payments and emergency subsidies for large-scale industrial farms, which starkly contrasts with the limited support provided to small farmers through competitive grants averaging around $33.5 million.
Oriana J Bolden of Sierra Saffron Herb & Herb Co in California emphasizes that recent changes have worsened the resource gap and increased small farmers' precarity due to cuts in government programs like Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA).
The loss of these programs has resulted in a significant portion of income loss for small farmers, making it even more challenging for them to survive in an industry already plagued by challenges. Bolden warns that the end of DEI programs aimed at supporting women, BIPOC, queer, and young farmers does not level the playing field but mainly benefits massive commercial operations.
The irony lies in the fact that SNAP benefits are seen as a handout when in reality, they come with a personal financial risk for small-scale farmers. The most vulnerable consumers and growers are precisely those who need assistance the most.
The US government's latest decision to temporarily suspend Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits has left millions of Americans struggling to access basic necessities, including food. The unexpected move led to widespread panic and a scramble for local farmers, who were expected to provide assistance in the form of free produce and other essential items.
Small-scale farmers, however, are not equipped to bear the weight of this crisis. According to recent data, between half to 79% of small family farms are at risk of financial collapse due to inadequate support from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).
The system puts small farmers at a disadvantage, as subsidies and relief programs designed for large-scale operations with higher gross cash farm income (GCFI) benefits. The majority of these subsidies are tied to the production of major commodity crops like corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice, which primarily benefit industrial farming operations.
Frederick Griffin of Ebony Tree Farms in Georgia notes that small farms feel the shock of a crisis just as quickly as households do but struggle to cope due to the loss of sales channels and increased costs. Giving food away without a structured system is not only unsustainable but also jeopardizes the farm's survival.
The USDA has earmarked an average of $40 billion in direct payments and emergency subsidies for large-scale industrial farms, which starkly contrasts with the limited support provided to small farmers through competitive grants averaging around $33.5 million.
Oriana J Bolden of Sierra Saffron Herb & Herb Co in California emphasizes that recent changes have worsened the resource gap and increased small farmers' precarity due to cuts in government programs like Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA).
The loss of these programs has resulted in a significant portion of income loss for small farmers, making it even more challenging for them to survive in an industry already plagued by challenges. Bolden warns that the end of DEI programs aimed at supporting women, BIPOC, queer, and young farmers does not level the playing field but mainly benefits massive commercial operations.
The irony lies in the fact that SNAP benefits are seen as a handout when in reality, they come with a personal financial risk for small-scale farmers. The most vulnerable consumers and growers are precisely those who need assistance the most.